"Something's Up" In America's Big Berg
Selected Poems from The Alaska Mystery Collection
and The Tree Series
by Paula Marie Rose
Update November 12, 2008: I'll be posting more emails between Eric and me directly below, but they might not be in chronological order, and will only be a few examples of his refusing to schedule, or to allow my Summer 2008 visitation to occur. To save space, I won't post the actual reservation page or itinerary; email me if you want to see that. Also, the third Christmas 2008 reservation I had made for Claire and sent to him to pay (per our current 2006 Child Custody Agreement, it's his responsibility to pay for her transportation) he let expire, according to the Alaska Airlines website message, when I checked the confirmation code. As is his pattern during the past year, Eric chose to ignore most of the emails I sent to him; except for the one in August, below.
And while he states that he sent an email to me on August 15; I didn't receive anything from him with the date of August 15, 2008 and asked both my email provider and his to look into where that email which he claims he sent, landed. No confirmation of his ever sending anything to me dated August 15, 2008 has been received from the providers by me. NOTE: I used the term "my attorney" loosely, as the one Juneau attorney who did provide limited services for $200 for an initial review of my "Denial of Visitation" issue declined to represent me. After several attorneys in the Berg chose to pass or to not reply to my request for review or representation, I recognized that as a pattern, and stopped wasting time looking for one.
This is the e-mail I sent to you Friday, August 15.
I am not going to send Claire to L.A. I have not responded to your e-mails since April because you have posted my, and others’, e-mails on the web without our approval. That is a complete breach of trust. Your bizarre behavior, e-mails, and web site have caused your family, friends, and me to become concerned about your mental health and stability. I am concerned for you and would help you get a mental health evaluation and treatment if you were willing, but my primary concern is for Claire’s safety, and it is for that reason that I will not send her to L.A. Also, she has made it clear to me she has no desire to visit you there. As you and I agreed years ago, we would only have Claire visit you outside of Juneau if she wanted to.
At this point you may want to have your attorney contact my attorney. My attorney is Paul Grant, 217 2nd St., Suite 204 , Juneau Alaska 99801 . His phone number is 907.586.2701. He is very familiar with this situation and shares my concerns, and those expressed by the members of your family and friends, who support me and my decision not to send Claire to visit you.
Update November 11, 2008. In Blue a few lines directly from TD AMERITRADE to me about what Eric has done to my brokerage account, when he knew it was solely mine; as I received it during our 2006 Property Settlement Agreement. CLICK HERE FOR The Page of the Agreement which refers to Jointly held stocks under Item 6.
"Mr. Swanson spoke with one of our brokers on
September 16, 2008. During this call the online password
was reset, he submitted a Removal of Non-maketable
Security Form ,and placed an order to sell Ultra Short S&P 500
Mr. Swanson called back later that day to place a freeze onthe account."
Update October 4, 2008. I've sent Eric several emails in the last couple of weeks, mostly relating to our formerly joint TD Ameritrade Account which I became sole owner of per our Property Settlement Agreement signed on October 3, 2006. According to the series of email confirmations that I received from TD Ameritrade, Eric contacted them and proceeded to make changes to the password, PIN number, authorized a sale of the shares in the account, and asked them to close the account. When I phoned him on September 17, 2008 to ask why he had willingly, knowingly, and without my permission accessed my account, made unauthorized changes, and requested to have it closed, he said "I wanted my name removed from the account." I suggested that he should have asked me about removing his name from my account, or that TD Ameritrade should have been able to provide him with a form, if he had asked them to do so. He apologized verbally to me for doing this action, and promised to email me the password, pin, etc. which as of November 11, 2008, he has not done. I have asked him repeatedly to send them via email, and no reply from him has been received by me.
TD AMERITRADE has requested that I send documentation of the Property Settlement, to prove my claim as sole owner. Which is the correct response, but in the meantime they have chosen to lock the account. It's the principle of Eric's actions which annoy me the most; and if his true intentions were to have his name removed, why didn't TD Ameritrade simply send him the form, or conduct a 3 way conference call to ask me what my preference was?
I have also asked him to send me medical records and information on Claire, which he stated that he would, and has not. Note: I have asked him about the Gardasil vaccine, and he has not answered me as to whether or not she has had it. He knew that I thought it was unnecessary, and did not want her to receive it. Hopefully, she has not received it, but based on his lack of answer, I see a pattern.
In the emails below, I deleted the name of the local dentist's office.
Like most of the family members and associated others who you will read about on this site; Eric usually chose to not reply to most of my specific emails, or to not answer the specific questions that they contained. That is a bit odd, being as he is very intelligent and witty; historically, he has added his amusing commentary to any questions or statements anyone in my family has made. As stated previously; in my family or circle, each person has their own take and opinion on things and until recently, couldn't express themselves fast enough.
For Eric to not make any comments, or to pass on such wonderful opportunities to express his snappy lines, is rather notable. I only included a few of the most interesting in each of the Emails To/From pages, but there were many. For the more serious topics which he chose to not answer; or only some of them after my repeatedly asking, is rather odd.
Although several emails presented here, and in other areas of the site, may contain portions of the same material, it is necessary to include them to highlight the fact that I asked numerous people about the same situation, or to explain their words and behaviors, or what they thought about certain events. The Collective Silence is remarkable.
I visited Claire and Eric in their home in Juneau, AK, April 2 to April 9, 2008. Eric appeared to be much more like the man I knew, and the visit went well. An improvement over the September 2007 visit that I made to Juneau as a surprise for Claire, when he did not invite me to stay in his home, as I always had on previous visits, he refused to allow her to stay in the local motels with me, and limited my time with her. Also, during the Christmas 2007 family gathering in the Florida Keys, when he and I were having a private conversation; he would not allow me to take her shopping alone, and cited my "odd" behavior as his reason, but offered no details as to what he meant by that statement.
He was present, and his voice can also be heard on the short recording of Anna stating that I "was unwell" and he can be heard agreeing, and saying that I cannot take Claire shopping, etc. Click here. I originally thought that he was quiet, during this conversation with my sister Anna, but recalled being slightly surprised that his facial expression and body language showed complete agreement with her. Good thing I listened closer, although the quality is very poor, you can also hear his voice. I was mildly surprised by his attitude and words, being as there was no basis for such words and statements to be spewing from either he, nor Anna. I was not completely surprised; based on his attitudes and behaviors in September 2007 in Juneau, and his continued refusal to answer specific questions that I had repeatedly emailed him. There was, and never has been, any reason for him to say such things about me, or to deny me my parental rights to spend time alone with our daughter. It made me wonder just what he and Anna were trying to hide? Probably raising a few questions in your mind also.
I willingly gave him physical custody of our daughter Claire, during our Child Custody hearing in late September or early October of 2006; as I did and still do believe that it is better for her to continue to live in Juneau, and to finish her school years there. The Juneau School District has done a superior job in educating both of my daughters. We have shared Legal Custody, and have never had any disagreements or such unusual interactions before. I stayed at his home in for two weeks or so in June/July of 2007, and that visit was as pleasant as many prior stays. How unusual for his behavior and changes in attitude toward me to change so drastically, in such a short time; remarkably precipitated by an alleged Missing Persons report, I gather.
UPDATE May 15, 2008: I have sent the most of the emails addressed to Eric over the last several months to both his personal email address, and his office email address. It will be interesting to see if the Big Mainframe is collecting data on these exchanges, and how his employer filters, scans, and reviews the emails of its employees. It will be an important factor as to evaluating the involvement, or level of cooperation provided by his employer; once his position is publicly known. And if these emails all "disappear" from the Mainframe and it's backup systems, and his regular email account, that'd be a huge Red Flag.
Directly below are the most recent emails that I am waiting for specific answers to from Eric and Val. As you will note, I have repeatedly asked for specific information from each of them, more than once. On the other hand, no answer is an answer in itself; particularly to the accusation which neither will confirm or deny making (in Valerie's case) or having a concern about such an event possibly taking place. Sniff Sniff, I smell Dead Fish.
Their answers should shed some light on their actions, words, and behaviors which took place over the Christmas 2007 family gathering in the Keys, during the summer of 2007 when I was allegedly "Missing," and the strange, unusual, or non responses I have received or experienced from them over the last 10 months or so. As with all the other emails, my address is active; I removed theirs.
I'm back in L.A. from DC, and mapping out my schedule.
Are you and Claire still planning to go to Seattle for a vacation? She didn't have the dates when she and I last spoke the other day.
When is it convenient for you for me to either come up to Juneau for a visit with her, or for you to fly her here to L.A?
Have you seen Val? I haven't heard from her since just after Mother's Day. How odd.
|Date:||Tue, 10 Jun 2008 09:57:52 -0700 (PDT)|
|From:||"Star" <email@example.com> Add to Address Book Add Mobile Alert|
|Subject:||Looking at travel dates|
|To:||"Eric >, "EWS" <>|
|Fri, 23 May 2008 15:12:18 -0700 (PDT)|
|From:||"Star" <firstname.lastname@example.org> Add to Address Book Add Mobile Alert|
|Date:||Mon, 19 May 2008 09:30:47 -0700 (PDT)|
|From:||"Star" <email@example.com> Add Mobile Alert|
|Subject:||May 19, 2008|
"Eric >, "EWS"
Next time you stop by the credit union, would you please move $700 from our old Jt. Acct. to my current savings? I am unable to do it online, and will close them out next time I'm up there.
What are you giving XXXXXXX (deleted by PMR) for Graduation? I thought I'd send her a check.
Haven't heard back from you on about your summer vacation plans or my visitation schedule with Claire? Are you going to WA in July?
Have you seen Val? She left me a VM after Mother's Day, and has yet to answer the emails about the Kidnapping of Claire accusation, and who inquired about my Visa Card activity sometime last summer. Same as you have not, but you are avoiding doing so for your own reasons.
Any ideas as to why she would make up such lies and accusations? I certainly hope she collects herself soon and answers those emails; as Bank of America has a completely different story than hers, and they will take a dim view of being named in any liability lawsuit. I know that some of my card activity information that she has written about, and parroted back to me at Christmas was partially accurate, with some incomplete or inaccurate details. She got it from someone, and if she or someone else was impersonating me to get it; that is also a crime.
Have you been out fishing yet? PR
Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 10:14:12 -0700 (PDT)
|Print - Close Window|
|Date:||Fri, 9 May 2008 17:05:56 -0700 (PDT)|
|Subject:||Kidnapping questions, etc.|
|To:||"Eric <>, "EWS" <>, "val" <>|
Hi Eric and Valerie
I am very surprised that you have yet to answer my questions about the accusation by Valerie that I was going to kidnap Claire at Christmas. As you can see by the insert below; I have been in the Big Fed Database for some time, and have applied for several.
Based on the extremely unusual behaviors and words of my family, yourself, and several former friends over the past year; there will be quite a few questions raised during my next interview.
Please answer the questions I have previously asked you below, and list any clarifications or concerns that you may have.
It is unacceptable to have such unfounded ridiculous rumors and accusations about my character and integrity as a mother, and possible job applicant, be floating around. I will not have my employment opportunities limited by the lies of others.
Any evidence to justify such claims that you have, please forward to me via email. The Feds like facts, so any recordings, letters, emails, handwritten notes, etc. that you may have would be helpful to their determining my suitability or unsuitability for employment. I'll be pleased to share any raw data of yours with them.
To date, the lack of response to these and other numerous questions asked by me to you both, and others, is surprising and does nod in the direction of suspicions being raised by many.
Looking forward to reading yours!
|FBIjobs.gov is an official site of the U.S. Federal Government, U.S. Department of Justice |
FBIjobs.gov is an official site of the U.S. Federal Government,
U.S. Department of Justice
Printable View This message is not flagged. [ Flag Message - Mark as Unread ]
It's Thursday, and we'd like to get these specifics nailed down this week. Please reply to all questions below to the best of your ability.
1. Please review the questions I have previously asked you below about the alleged kidnapping plot of Claire that Valerie spoke to me about at Christmas.
Your lack of response to such an outrageous statement by Val is very puzzling. Her use of the word "We," indicated she was not alone in her thinking.
2. Were you under the impression that I was there at Anna's to kidnap Claire?
3. Or that I would ever do so at any time; past, present, or future?
4. You have previously stated that you know nothing about any inquiry into my credit card accounts activities by family or Police last summer.
Valerie stated in part: " Because no one knew where you were, trying to determine your whereabouts was the reason behind the police making an inquiry with the credit card company."
Are her words correct? What was the time frame that "no one knew where you were..." that she is referring to?
Does this tie in with that Missing Persons report that you told me that Anna filed on me and she showed you a copy of when she was in Juneau in July 2007? Have you a copy of that alleged report? Also the "gone missing" date, and the "found" date; so that I can match them up with my credit card records.
Please do your best to provide as many details as possible.
Thanks for your prompt reply and cooperation.
|Print - Close Window|
|Date:||Tue, 6 May 2008 09:02:16 -0700 (PDT)|
|To:||"Eric <>, "EWS" <t>|
|Date:||Mon, 05 May 2008 18:32:30 -0800|
|From:||"Eric " <t> Add Mobile Alert|
Delete Reply Forward Move...
Printable View This message is not flagged. [ Flag Message - Mark as Unread ]
Would you please take a few minutes and follow up on answering the questions about the Police, banks, etc.
And then add any information you have about that kidnapping of Claire plot that Valerie brought up to me while she and I were walking back to the guest quarters on Cudjoe Key at Christmastime.
I doubt very much if she dreamed up such a wild accusation on her own. Perhaps you have some additional information? That might possibly have been the most unbelievable statement I've ever heard Val make. What are your thoughts?
Looking forward to hearing back from you with some answers ASAP.
I spoke with Claire yesterday, and she sounded very upbeat and is looking forward to her big dance. Thanks, PR
Star <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
Date: Mon, 5 May 2008 14:04:15 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 18:14:57 -0700 (PDT)
Why are you going to Juneau during the 1st week of April? I hope it is to seek professional counseling for your Secretive Spy paranoia issues. Your bizarre actions are very disturbing to your family and friends.
ERIC DID NOT RESPOND TO THIS EMAIL.
|Print - Close Window|
|Date:||Mon, 17 Dec 2007 09:52:02 -0800 (PST)|
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 12:37:43 -0800 (PST)
From: PR <email@example.com>
Subject: Re: Christmas is coming...
Again, Who did Jewel contact? How, and when?
The only "help" I need is for people to answer my questions about their words and actions. Please do your part in assisting me by answering the above questions.
Yes, the facts and the truth are so astonishing, I find them to be rather bizarre and almost unbelievable myself.
I'm done. I told you my thoughts, and if you choose not to get help, then that is your business. I have no idea what you are trying to say about lies, spies, and films. So, don't send me any more information; because I have no idea what you are talking about and I find it to be bizarre thinking on your part.
Who did Jewel contact? I was never "Missing" and am always clearly in plain sight to all, Police included.
If there were/are no hidden cameras, then there can't be any footage in which I am featured, however it is manipulated, or spliced. It is a crime to photograph someone during instances where they have a "reasonable expectation of privacy." That would also included any of Nelsons or Bevin's, as I repeated requested that they not include me in their filming.
My car is a prop for my photography, and I do my own staging when I feel like it. Gail enjoyed every second of the "Production", when I have time, I'll share the photos.
I'm comfortable with myself and the book project I'm working on, and am happy to hear that you don't find any of these few mentioned topics to be strange behavior. If you find lies, wastebin debris collecting, and other activities to be normal, then perhaps you need seek some professional help.
Mark wrote:Jewel is the one that got in touch with us to let us know you were missing.
There are no hidden cameras around either.
Nobody understands why you had dildos and posters on your car either.
There is no strange behavior either.
Please, get some counseling.
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 10:15:36 -0800 (PST) From: "PR" <firstname.lastname@example.org> Add to Address Book Add Mobile Alert Subject: Re: Christmas is coming... To: Mark
Paranoid gibberish? No, I am simply writing about actual events, in which the participants (family members and others) continue to deny or not answer direct question about.
I don't see any Government agents watching me, whatever gave you that idea? I do notice many unusual activities and goings on while enjoying daily life however. Some of which the FBI might be interested in knowing about, as I continue to gather evidence and clues for my book. But that's farther down the road.
Topped off with my family and former friends exhibiting strange and unusual behaviors, which they continue to deny or not explain; (you included) I can only deduce that there is one Fantastic story to be uncovered.
Here' a quick summary of one small event, which Gail still hasn't given her reply to as why she was acting in such a manner, or to correct any details which I might have misinterpreted. Real people, real names, real events, no matter how bizarre this sounds, did take place. I might be off on the part about Mom and Dad receiving updates, and beaming back to the Keys, etc. but Dad told me in person that he had been aware of all this going on, and had been fully informed from the beginning, and so did all of you. Now why would that be? And every word of what Gail ("Natasha" in this story) said and did is true. If there's nothing to it, then why did she do it?
I'd like to hear your opinion of Gail's behavior and motives. Gail's never spent a dime of her own money she didn't have to; that's fact You absolutely know is true.
I'm looking forward to seeing all of you at Christmas; I feel the need to see that everyone is back to "normal."
Gail, aka "Natasha" of the KGB, jetsets on a moments notice (using her own mileage, no less) arrives in L.A., August 23, rents a car (c'est impossible!! elle une Cheapskate!! because sister Paula, aka "Emma" has been MIA (according to "sources") for weeks. A ridiculous ploy by the team of "mercenaries" , as Paula has been seen daily in said house and 'hood by numerous people, including the police, and personally handed Jewel the rent check on July 31, 2007 (or the first of August.)
Skewed facts from the get go, as 'Tash has not been invited by anyone, and the landlord Jewel aka "Jade" claims no prior knowledge of the covert "Trip to Tarzana" by Natasha, (double agent for KBG and ??), yet allows her in, and the pair of them chum it right up. Jewel states in perfect astonishment how much alike the voices of Gail and Paula sound, and silently applaudes the fact of how easy it will be to dub the voices over spliced video, featuring the private or less than glamourous moments of pj's with bed head, filmed of Paula during the months she lived there. What a money maker that will be!!
Laurence ??, a noted photographer of fetish of all kinds, has arrived the day before, and charms Gail with hours of stories and sharing of photographs of his selected works and personal fetish favorites. "Natasha" eagerly learns some new clothing styles, and tricks to perform for the new man she has recently lassoed, aptly named Jim Sharkey (Real Name!!) aka "Fin Grin."
Meanwhile, the cameras are rolling and the audio is picking up every sound which is being transmitted back to HQ via satellite. At the empty house next door, the crew tiptoes in for a peek at the action, and to change the tapes, as the Paula and Gail get dressed for a drive in the "DICKED Mobile" an ordinary Toyota Corolla souped up with posters and vibrators for the occasion. Gail carefully wraps a piece of black pantyhose around the larges vibe, as a toast to her last lover, a black man named Jevon, aka "Big John."
(Hey, it should have been on "Pimp My Ride" I missed another photo op...)
Another party enters the bathroom, settles on the seat for a productive crap, and mutters a muffled curse, as they had forgotten to lock the door which deactivates the hidden camera in the toilet. No Shit!! HQ has promised to edit any accidental footage, but everyone knows the score. More is more.
Meanwhile, back at the "Family Ranch" in Cowtown, OR; Mom and Dad (still unnamed characters) breathlessly "tune in" via satellite to see all the action being filmed from the hidden camera in the lamp and wall. In the Florida Keys, message are being relayed from HQ, and the beamed back to ........
You need to get yourself some psychiatric help and shouldn't come to Florida to ruin Christmas for everyone with your paranoid gibberish about the government agents watching you.
None of this is funny; and I don't want to see you when you are acting like this. Please get some professional help.
Mark________________________________Ha!! What a great one line response, Mark. As I always say, "brevity and clarity."
Or as written in my PI book "Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean someone isn't following you."
Frankly, I've never been more relaxed in my life. I've found a true calling in writing.
Attention!! FOX NEWS UPDATE: "The numbers of unmanned shopping carts seen abandoned in various locations nationwide have surged in recent months, and Paula Rose, an unpublished writer from Alaska, is on scene, and reporting live. Full report at 11:00."
Is this going to be one hell of a book or what? The facts, events, and people are True, which is downright fascinating.
GOD Bless America, and Freedom of the Press.
Off to the library to do more research.
From: Mark View Contact Details Add Mobile Alert Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2007 16:10:55 EST Subject: Re: Christmas is coming... To:
email@example.com, Anna, Gail
Someone is a little paranoid here.
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2007 11:28:54 -0800 (PST) From: "PR" <firstname.lastname@example.org> Add to Address Book Add Mobile Alert Subject: Christmas is coming... To: "anna" Mark Gail
Do you have the tree up yet Anna? Real Tree Smell, gotta love it. Beats "Low Tide" any day. Anybody made Mom's fruitcake receipe yet? Hers is about the best around.
Haven't heard back from any of you about character names, so keep thinking about what you'd like to named, in case the story has to be published as "Fiction" instead of "Historical, or True Crime." My preference was not to involve our family, but the story has morphed into such a bonanza of true facts and details, that it's impossible not to include all of us.
I've asked around a bit, and it appears that the shopping cart set up is one of the "markers" used by survelliance teams (criminal, private, and law enforcement) to place a person in an area, which can then be edited to suit. Wow!! is that true, Anna, and did AST ever "create" evidence when you were a Trooper?
One would like to believe that law enforcement personnel are upholding the laws, not breaking them. Apparently, that is very naive thinking on my part, according to "sources." I've seen hundreds of shopping carts in the last several months, so that's "quite an operation" aimed at "someone." And the Homeless leave them be, which is what aroused my curiousity in the first place. Hhhhmmmmm.....
Gail, did you share the summary of the "Trip to Tarzana" with anyone yet? I forgot to add in how you went into detail on the phone while I was at the "family ranch in OR" (Mom and Dad's) about your vampire dreams or whatever, again using the code word of "menopause" for "period", and how Mom scurried into the bathroom to check the wastebin immediately, and for several days following after I used it. GROSS!!! But true. Yes indeed, I did have my period while ensconced with my parents at Chez TJ . And also at Anna and Rob's, probably more than once during numerous visits. That was only one of numerous examples of odd and bizarre behavior she and Dad both exhibited while I was visiting them. Which followed the pattern which you started when you came to Tarzana and brought up the subject of "menopause" and rummaged in my wastebin yourself. Was that for the benefit of the KGB (are you double dipping?) or domestic intelligence?
Why would anyone want my used feminine products, other than for DNA, or to plant as evidence at a later time? And why would my own family want to set me up for something? Unless they were hiding something themselves, or being paid to, or coerced into cooperating by??? CIA, FBI, NSA, Military intelligence, Big Oil??
At least the FBI will have a few people to interview if items which were mine appear mysteriously, or under unusual circumstances at places I might or might not have been.
Oh, if I have it all wrong; I'm all ears for what those few incidences were about. And any of the numerous odd situations anyone wants to explain. So that we are all on the same page, so to speak. Otherwise, everything will be in the book, as it happened. Including the people who were all there in Florida in September; Nelson, Bevin, Sharkey, etc. Nelson will FINALLY get his "15 minutes of Fame"
in my book, which is good in case his filmmaking career never pans out.
No need to create details, or make things up. What a story our family is! Mark, get out the video camera and please pass the "licorice."
And where is HQ? I couldn't figure out the satellite linkage to the receiver. Langley? DC? Osaka? Moscow?
Everybody, all in sync now--window shades at 1/2 way mark upon departure!
Looking forward to seeing everyone!
Over and Out.
FOR THE RECORD:
I honestly do not think that the man who I was renting from was harming his daughter. What I described in this email series that I wrote to my Dad about, and later shared with Eric; was true, and unusual. I thought it was unusual behavior for him to sleep in his daughter's room when a comfortable sofa was available in the living room, and thought that it was inappropriate for him to spend a few large blocks of time in her room with her, with the door closed. After careful consideration; I made certain that the "Something's Up" feeling that I had about their relationship was cleared, and that no abuse was occurring before I left to go to Oregon to my parent's house.
The facts and events are exactly as I described them, but I believe that the man was an unwilling participant in a charade of some sort; perhaps to have me enter her room? I don't know; my number one priority was to be sure that she was not being abused, and to use to event as an opportunity to see what my Dad's reaction would be. Knowing how my Dad thinks, and his own parenting methods of us when I was young; his answer was exactly as I expected it to be.
My Dad's written lack of concern for the little girl, and his nonchalant attitude about my suspicions of my being filmed without my consent, are appalling. I was not surprised by any of the statements that my Dad made, both in writing, and later in person.
Paula Marie Rose April 18, 2008
Eric Did not reply to this email. He did finally send a reply on December 18, 2007, after I again asked for his opinion. He did not reply to the other questions that I asked about the MP report, or other topics.
I am completely disgusted to know that my own Father would knowingly look the other way and told me to do so when I suggested that a child might be being abused in any shape or form. Although I knew from the minute I moved into that house that something was up; I used that incident as an opportunity to see what my Father's reaction would be. His words and lack of concern about the possibility of my privacy being invaded is also telling. When I brought this subject up in person, his only question was "have you seen yourself on the internet?" Any man who was interested in his daughters well being and safety would have had something more to say than that.
He also denied recalling anything about those horrific and explicit phone calls I received as a teen, and claims to not recall yanking the phone out of the wall and telling me to have it disconnected.
As my own Father will continue to deny and lie about things that happened to me in the past, and by his own admission would leave a child that he thought might be being abused because he didn't want to be involved, and suggested that I do the same; he will not be seeing Claire without you or I present.
I didn't want to have to share this series of emails with you but facts are facts. As a man and a father, I would hope your replies would be much different if Claire ever approaches you with events similar to what happened to me, as I described above.
Perhaps now you can understand why I am so curious as to what others are saying and doing that strike me as Odd, and with less than my best interests in mind. And if it's nothing, why are so many people saying unusual things and labeling me in unflattering terms? These and others are words from inboxes and mouths of others, not "created" or "dreamed up" by me.
I'd appreciate hearing your take on my Dad, and anyone else you might have an alternative view from mine on.
Thanks, and a Big Hug for Claire.
|From:||"Paula Rose" <email@example.com> Add to Address Book Add Mobile Alert|
A setup is a setup. This isn't the first, and it is a criminal activity. I'm much more curious as to the "Why" and who is the Big Cheese receiving the material. Being filmed and recorded is a part of life in todays world, but not in areas where a person has a reasonable expectation of privacy. And such material can easily be used in a very malicious manner.
Being as you have prior Military service with some clearance, Jay is former Military, Anna was a State Trooper, and Gail copped a number from someone several years ago and phoned the CIA; all of those tidbits have raised a few flags somewhere, especially post 9/11.
Numerous other inconsistancies and inconveniences have added up over time; spiking my interest in following up; including doing a little staging myself when the mood strikes, just to keep the cameras rolling.
Juneau's rumored dark history is part of it, because some unusual questions have been asked in the past by strangers. Whatever the reason, and whoever it is, I'll find out eventually. And any 3 lettered organizations shall be either the source, or the seekers of. Smile for the cameras, I'll be bringing them with me.
From: Paula Rose <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: dad <>
Sent: Mon, Oct 29 6:24 PM
Subject: Re: Saturday
"Head North" is the plan. Many answers will be found in Alaska. Something very fishy has been going on for decades, and I'm glad to hear that you are willing to fill in the details.
As you have always said "Everybody is hiding something." And some of those 'Everybodies' seem to be worried that I might know something they would rather I didn't.
When things don't add up, I notice. When coincidences stack up at record speed, I see a house of cards. I've been making note for some time, and see that there are many players; some chiefs and many indians.
It's time to clear the air, and let the chips fall where they may. What do you have to lose by sharing what you know?
|Date:||Tue, 23 Oct 2007 22:14:12 -0700 (PDT)|
|From:||"Paula Rose" <email@example.com> Add to Address Book Add Mobile Alert|
|Subject:||Re: Arrival date|
I hear what you're saying, but I'll stay at least through this upcoming weekend to be sure everything is as it should be. Probably is, but as I said previously, I based my snap decisions about male behavior based on whether or not You would do any given action. If My Dad wouldn't do that, it's probably not the right thing to do. Worked so far and I'm over 40.
And legally, if something were to come to light at a later time; I Truly have to feel that she was not in any danger when I left. Also in good conscious, I wouldn't leave a child who I thought was being mistreated in Any way.
While I don't feel unsafe for myself, that was just such a strange situation. Today I helped him put up lattice panels over the patio roof, to give him the benefit of the doubt and to learn a home improvement technique.
I noticed 2 objects which looked like outdoor sockets, so I asked him if they were floodlight sockets or cameras. He said cameras, and a few other details, like where he it bought them from, and were located around the house. Made a joke about 1 in my bedroom, and later another joke about 1 being in my bathroom. That thought had crossed my mind some time ago, so yesterday I had left my Law for Photographers book on the living room table. Funny thing is, he usually leaves the back door unlocked, and told me so when I moved in. I asked "why buy security cameras if you don't bother to lock the door?" he was at a short loss for that answer, but managed a weak one. Outdoor cam pix attached.
As a photographer, I know that surveillence and purv cams come in every shape, size, and object one can think of. Found one in a hotel once. Might be a good time for me to brush up on specifics. Sure would suck to see myself on some internet site taking a crap or shower, or worse, as anything can be faked and damn well with today's technology. But at least I'll have a really good idea where the FBI could start looking.
Yes, he has a girlfriend, she's here now. Seems pleasant and intelligent. Normal people, unusual situations and words; I can take and make a joke as well as anyone, it's when things seem just a little off that the red flags wave.
I'll let you know when I leave here, don't worry. I'm not in danger, and it probably isn't the first time I've been on camera, and most likely won't be the last. Don't tell Mom, she'll only get upset and perhaps over nothing.
Great move on your GOOG! Let's hear it for Prosperity.
|Print - Close Window|
|Date:||Tue, 18 Dec 2007 19:00:40 -0800 (PST)|
|Subject:||In case you didn't see this at work.|
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 17:32:26 -0800 (PST)
From: PR <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: RE: mail and papers
To: "Eric" <Eric>
I was anticipating your words to be what you replied, or a version thereof. Which is a huge relief, and I expect you will not allow Claire to visit with either of my parents unless you or I are with her. I'd like to think we are on the same page regarding that issue.
Based on Gail's disgusting habit of rummaging in the wastebin for my used feminine products, and all the other unusual behaviors and statements she has made in my presence, I expect you to supervise her interactions with Claire also.
Please be certain that the driver of any vehicle in which Claire is riding has not, and will not, consume Any alcohol at any time while she is being taken to and from any events. You may have to specify that, as the drinking and driving in the Keys was a regular occurance, although Mark did not.
And please answer my other emails about who Jewel allegedly contacted, and any other specifics you can add. I need a copy of that Missing Persons report for my book, as the details are coming up short from all who said they filed it, or saw it. Please refer to that email and describe exactly what you saw, who showed it to you, the date, approximate time, and the location.
See you soon, probably Saturday.
Eric " <> wrote:I do not condone any such behavior or thinking.
From: PR [mailto:email@example.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 12:57 PM
To: EricSubject: RE: mail and papersI appreciate your complimentary statement. The "work" now is about protecting my photographs from being exploited by others, and wading in the sea of government beauracracy, which ultimately should be in my favor.
What is your take on Mark's lack of response to my direct questions? Do you have any idea why so many people are refusing to answer my direct questions?
And were you surprised at my Dad's comments about what one should do in the case of possible or suspected child abuse? Or his reaction to my statements about possibly being filmed in what should have been private quarters? Frankly, I wasn't, based on how he treated his own children while growing up. It is sickening to think that he hasn't changed in what he believes is acceptable behavior. I would like to hear from you directly that you don't condone such behavior, or ways of thinking, regardless of who is involved.
To: Swanson, Eric W (DOA); EWS
Subject: mail and papersHi Eric,
Please be sure you have the copies of the QDRO, Dissolution, and Child Custody Agreement to bring to Florida . If you can't find them, please go to the Court on your lunch and have them copied, (I think it's $10) I dug through my paperwork and still can't find any of my copies. And my mail, especially the AAA. The Chariot is racking up the miles!
I've been in touch with the Copyright office, and think we have figured out what we need for the glitch there, so that's good. If not, I'll be going to DC after Florida .