"Something's Up" In America's Big Berg
Selected Poems from The Alaska Mystery Collection
and The Tree Series
by Paula Marie Rose
I have a busy day and won't have time to do a full review and comment on these pages until later. I have smudged out my daughter's last name, and that of the Child Custody Investigator. It's pretty much the same recycled information and objections as Mr. Grant has previously submitted, which he also has highly dramatized, but he has tossed in a few statues for the Judge to consider. Statues or not, the Truth is what is important for everyone to consider, and my publishing all sides is very fair and balanced. The Judge may have the authority to order some parts be removed; I'll have to check into that. If anyone has any Supreme Court decisions on Website Cases, please send it to me at firstname.lastname@example.org
Again, he specifically mentions Dr. Elaine Schroeder's Affidavit, and refers to her as my daughter Claire's "therapist". How strange that Dr. Elaine Schroeder has yet to produce any proof that she has actually seen my daughter in a professional capacity. He also states below that I have published highly personal details about the sex life and personal habits of Anna Kathryn Sanders. I provided a very brief and factual overview of my sister, Anna, and she was very proud to consider herself a Lesbian for a few years of her life. Any other statements I have made about others he mentions are also true and factual; even if they don't like the truth being told. I have graciously left out many stunning facts about many, as a courtesy to spouses, or others who may be associated with those folks listed in my Autobiography. He states that my sharing my side of the story to their comments and Affidavits is "witness tampering". The facts, emails, and other statements I have provided show proof that some of those witness statements and affidavits contain false material or lies, which need to be addressed. I was unable to find an Alaska attorney to represent me, and I have chosen to use this website to represent my side of the story.
He claims that some of my chapter titles in this story are "designed to ridicule the court's proceedings." False, as I have previously stated under the section "Order for Evidentiary Hearing..." section:
"I have marked out the names of the court staff, the appointed child custody investigator, and the Judge, as I still have an elevated level of respect and appreciation for the legal system, and legal processes, and some staff."
Mr. Grant continues his objections and has submitted a proposed Order for the Judge to sign. To summarize his words, he doesn't want anything about anyone connected to me, or this case, to be heard or read online, and is insisting it be removed. He further adds that all those materials exchanged with, or addressed to others be removed from this website. He also states that I might choose to disable this site completely. Nope, not a chance.
Kinda makes you wonder what doesn't he want people to see, doesn't it?