WHEN FOLKS DON'T REPLY, WE ALL WONDER WHY.

First up on the page is good ol' Bank of America.  Don't miss the section "B of A Emails and the Merlin Teller Printout." 

UPDATE  March 31, 2009.   While going through a box of mail I had recently received, I found a memo from Bank of America regarding who inquired about my Visa Account ending in 3732.    B of A did not send the reply to the address I had given them, they sent it to the address on my account.   Good thing I didn't need it for the March 13, 2009 hearing; Valerie was present but did not testify.  

Their written reply is below, and my verbal conversation with B of A staff in May of 2008 had already confirmed that no court order was on file, and no police department had had access to my account activity.

  That leaves Valerie Brittina Rose on the hook for coughing up a name for the officer she states in her Affidavit on Page 2 and Page 3 that was provided information on my Visa account, and later shared it with her.   Such a statement must have been a lie from her lips, as Bank of America has always claimed that no police were given access to my account during 2007.  There is nothing on the copy of the Missing Persons report that I have about any officer having an unauthorized browse of my credit card accounts, and I have no additional papers with the MP report.  Valerie knew where I kept my credit card information and personal papers and would have had easy access to it.  Her knowledge of some specific account activity suggests that she may have phoned up Bank of America, while impersonating me.   Her affidavit is full of blather and gibberish, inaccurate or false statements, and tall tales.  And I never denied renting a car in 2007, but am still very curious as to how she would known that I had.   Does she have super duper eyesight to see what I am driving, or eating, or wearing, from a distance hundreds or thousands of miles between us?  

  C'mon Valerie!  Gimme the officer's name, so I can ask them about your outrageous claim; another party can take the blame.  And how 'bout producing some dates, times, etc.  Surely, this MP charade y'all had conjured up musta been important enough to write down on your calendars?  

I'll take a copy of her affidavit with me, and B of A's reply, and a copy of the MP report that Anna Sanders filed on me (but couldn't recall anything about it in her voice message to me of November 10, 2007)  next stop by the local cop shop, a.k.a. The West Valley Area Police Station, conveniently located right up the street in beautiful Reseda, CA.   A pleasant group of folks serving the local community, 24/7.   There is no Tarzana Police Department, so who was the Troll that Valerie was talking with, and where were they located?  Only in her head, it appears.

   I sent a letter by Certified Mail to the B of A branches in Charlotte, NC, and in Wilmington, DE, asking them to verify my account activity.  In the Affidavit of Valerie Brittina Rose, she made some claims about police gathering information about my Visa account activity, but my verbal conversation with B of A in May of 2008 said "No activity by police, no court order on file."  

I like all of my facts to be in writing, so I usually head directly for the source.  I have noted a widespread pattern of nonresponse to my written requests for clarification or information, from individuals, businesses, and agencies. 

Across the board!  

Many other folks have taken note of the pattern, and confirm that they don't have that degree of a lack of cooperation by some of the same parties, or others.   

I find it very annoying to have to repeat myself, especially in writing, but I do so regularly.  This time, I wised up, and saved the $3.70 Certified fee and sent the second request by first class on January 21, 2009.

As with some other documents throughout this site, I have smudged out my cc number, and my signature.

 Click to enlarge

Click to enlarge 

 There's always plenty of room on the Wall of Shame, no problem making space for yet another name.  My written requests to the individuals below shall be posted at a later time, in case they change their minds, or their reply is on its way.  The questions I asked the CCI might be considered "Confidential" so I'll have to look into that first.  

Currently, I'm still waiting for a written reply from Jerry Zeiger.  Being as we have had a personal and professional relationship for the last several years, I am very disappointed that he has chosen to not reply to my written request for additional information about conversations he had with others about me.  It's been several weeks since I asked Jerry to provide me with specifics, such as dates, times, why he never mentioned the conversations to me, etc., and I really don't expect that he'll be replying.  

I have also made a written request to the Child Custody Investigator, asking for specifics, as there were conflicting statements about some conversation details with some people or events.  It's also been about a month or more since I made that request, and it doesn't appear that I'll be receiving a written reply.  Not unexpected, but it is yet another example of this amazingly widespread pattern which appears frequently when I ask questions.  

Does the world operate on a "Need to Know" basis?  When the topic is what people say about me, or when it affects my financial accounts, or when I ask for more information; I do have every right to expect a full and detailed reply. 

Here's the "Final Answer" from TD AMERITRADE.  Doesn't it just make you want to fire off a wire transfer and open an account with them?  I'll be transfering my accounts outta there and over to Scottrade at some point.

Read the play by play of the entire financial fiasco under "TD AMERITRADE:  Uncooperative Customer Service..."  and those only a few of the approximately 30 or so emails I had with them.  Shor Nuf!  I had to repeat my questions and information requests numerous times, many of which they avoided answering.

Re: Your email dated January 20, 2008 (KMM61848104I30411L0KM) Thursday, January 22, 2009 2:20 PM From: "Paula Rose" <paularoseimages@yahoo.com> To: "TD AMERITRADE - Jeremy Jasa" <jjasa@tdameritrade.com>   Hello Mr. Jasa, Your reply confirms that the email of October 30, 2008 where you detailed the actions, changes, and trades made by Eric William Swanson within my account are confirmed as on file at TD Ameritrade.  That's not too customer friendly of a closing statement that you have written, but it's always good to have proof when a business doesn't value their clients.  Sincerely, Paula M. Rose --- On Thu, 1/22/09, TD AMERITRADE - Jeremy Jasa <jjasa@tdameritrade.com> wrote: From: TD AMERITRADE - Jeremy Jasa <jjasa@tdameritrade.com> Subject: Re: Your email dated January 20, 2008 (KMM61848104I30411L0KM) To: "Paula Rose" <paularoseimages@yahoo.com> Date: Thursday, January 22, 2009, 12:20 PM Ms. Rose, Your inquiry has been received by TD AMERITRADE and has been thoroughly researched. This firm has already provided you our response and resolution in regards to your inquiry. TD AMERITRADE considers your inquiry resolved and deems no further action is needed. Any additional correspondence regarding this matter will go unanswered and simply be added to your case. Best regards, Jeremy Jasa Senior Research Analyst Office of the President TD AMERITRADE Holding Corporation This electronic message transmission contains information from TD AMERITRADE Holding Corporation which may be confidential or privileged. The information is intended for the use of the individual or entity whose electronic mail address is named above. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please notify us by telephone (800-669-3900) immediately.